6th Grade - Gateway 1
Back to 6th Grade Overview
Note on review tool versions
See the series overview page to confirm the review tool version used to create this report.
- Our current review tool version is 2.0. Learn more
- Reports conducted using earlier review tools (v1.0 and v1.5) contain valuable insights but may not fully align with our current instructional priorities. Read our guide to using earlier reports and review tools
Loading navigation...
Text Quality
Text Quality & Complexity and Alignment to Standards ComponentsGateway 1 - Meets Expectations | 91% |
|---|---|
Criterion 1.1: Text Complexity and Quality | 20 / 20 |
Criterion 1.2: Alignment to the Standards with Tasks and Questions Grounded in Evidence | 13 / 16 |
The SpringBoard Grade 6 instructional materials meet the expectations for text quality and complexity and alignment to the standards. The instructional materials include texts that are worthy of students' time and attention and that support students’ advancing toward independent reading. The materials provide opportunities for rich and rigorous evidence-based discussions and writing about texts to build strong literacy skills.
Criterion 1.1: Text Complexity and Quality
Texts are worthy of students' time and attention: texts are of quality and are rigorous, meeting the text complexity criteria for each grade. Materials support students' advancing toward independent reading.
The SpringBoard Grade 6 instructional materials meet expectations for text quality and complexity. The materials include an appropriate distribution of texts suggested in the CCSS for Grade 6. In addition to literary texts, the program supports student access to strong informational texts. Anchor texts within the materials are of publishable quality, worthy of especially careful reading, and consider a range of student interests. Texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade according to quantitative analysis, qualitative analysis, and relationship to their associated student task. Over the course of the year, materials support students’ increasing literacy skills through a series of texts at a variety of complexity levels appropriate for Grade 6. The materials are accompanied by text complexity analyses and rationales for purpose and placement in the grade level, and the program’s anchor and supporting texts provide opportunities for students to engage in a range and volume of reading to achieve grade level reading proficiency.
Indicator 1a
Anchor texts are of publishable quality and worthy of especially careful reading and consider a range of student interests.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the criteria for anchor texts being of publishable quality and worthy of especially careful reading and consider a range of student interests. The reading selections include published texts, excerpts from published texts, and published authors. Texts are suitable for multiple examinations for multiple purposes, such as building academic vocabulary, gaining content knowledge, and facilitating access to more complex future texts. Texts offer personal perspectives on a variety of topics. Literary texts avoid stereotypes and one dimensional characters, representing instead a variety of cultural and ethnic backgrounds. Texts would meet a variety of student interests.
Examples of texts that demonstrate high quality include:
Unit 1
- Dan Gutman, My Superpowers
- Gary Soto, The Jacket
- Langston Hughes, “Thank you, Ma’am”
- Sandra Cisneros, “ Eleven”
- Walter Dean Myers, “ The Treasure of Lemon Brown”
Unit 2
- Sharon Creech, Walk Two Moons
- John Steinbeck, excerpt from Travels With Charley
Unit 3
- Lisa Ling, “Most Dangerous ‘Sport’ of All May be Cheerleading”
- John Adams, excerpt from “Letter on Thomas Jefferson”
Unit 4
- Judith Viorst, The Southpaw
- Lewis Carroll, “Jabberwocky”
- William Shakespeare, The Taming of the Shrew
Indicator 1b
Materials reflect the distribution of text types and genres required by the standards at each grade level.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the criteria that materials reflect the distribution of text types and genres required by the standards. Texts are of varying lengths and formats, and include poems, essays, articles, films, editorials, myths, novel excerpts, short stories, editorials, memoirs, biographies, and autobiographies. Over the course of the year, the program achieves a balance of time spent interacting with both literary and informational texts.
Texts reviewed for Grade 6 encompass a full spectrum of genres, ranging from Greek mythology to online news articles. Additionally, materials call for the use of film and video clips, incorporating a variety of media.
Examples of text types and genres include:
Unit 1 includes personal narrative, novel excerpt, short story, comic strip, picture book, fairy tale, poem. Examples include, but are not limited to:
- “The Circuit” by Francisco Jimenez
- “Flipped” by Wendelin Van Draanen
- “Daedalus and Icarus” by Geraldine McCaughrean
- “Eleven” by Sandra Cisneros
- “The Mysteries of Harris Burdick” by Chris Van Allsburg
Unit 2 includes novel, film clip, biography, autobiography. Examples include, but are not limited to:
- Walk Two Moons by Sharon Creech
- “Farewell to a Faithful Pal” by John Grogan
- Travels with Charley by John Steinbeck
- Dogs Make us Human by Temple Grandin
Unit 3 includes editorial, opinion, speech, letter. Examples include, but are not limited to:
- "Should Dodgeball be Banned in Schools?" by staff of TIME for Kids
- “Letter on Thomas Jefferson” by John Adams
- “Print Almost Anything” by Stephen Ornes
- “The First Americans” by Scott H. Peters
Unit 4 includes poetry, drama, play, short story, film. Examples include, but are not limited to:
- “Shakespeare’s Life” The British Library
- “The Southpaw” by Judith Viorst
- “Limericks” by Edward Lear
- “Oranges” by Gary Soto
- The Taming of the Shrew by William Shakespeare.
Indicator 1c
Texts have the appropriate level of complexity for the grade according to quantitative analysis, qualitative analysis, and relationship to their associated student task.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the expectations for texts having the appropriate level of complexity for the grade according to quantitative analysis, qualitative analysis, and relationship to their associated student task.
Quantitative tools (Lexile) measured dimensions of text complexity such as word frequency, sentence length, and text cohesion. According to CCSS standards, the suggested Lexile levels for grades 6-8 are 925-1185. Texts in these materials range from 660-1390.
Qualitative tools measure such features of text complexity as text structure, language clarity and conventions, knowledge demands, and levels of meaning and purpose that are evaluated by educators. The qualitative measures for Grade 6 materials include an appropriate mix of low, moderate, and high difficulty. While some texts might seem above the grade level expectations in quantitative measure, the qualitative features of texts that fall above or below the text complexity band merit their placement.
The demands of the accompanying student tasks range from low to challenging in their difficulty and demand difficulty correlates to complexity of text. More challenging texts may have lower difficulty task demands. Conversely, an accessible text may be paired with a challenging task.
Examples of texts with appropriate text complexity include:
In Unit 1, five of six anchor texts have an overall text complexity analysis of complex, indicating the upper range of suggested Grade 6 complexity.
- Activity 1.2: Text: “The Circuit” by Francisco Jimenez. Lexile-1020. Qualitative: Moderate. Task Demand: Moderate-Analyze.
- Activity 1.3: Text: “Daedalus and Icarus" by Geraldine McCaughrean. Lexile-750. Qualitative: Moderate. Task Demand: Moderate-Analyze.
In Unit 2, three of four anchor texts have an overall text complexity analysis of complex, indicating the upper range of suggested Grade 6 complexity.
- Activity 2.16: Text: “Travels with Charley” by John Steinbeck. Lexile-800. Qualitative: Moderate. Task Demand: Moderate-Analyze.
- Activity 2.17: Text: "Saying Farewell to a Faithful Pet” by John Grogan. Lexile-1100. Qualitative: Moderate. Task Demand: Moderate-Analyze.
In Unit 3, eight of eleven anchor texts have an overall text complexity analysis of complex, the remaining three texts have an overall text complexity analysis of very complex.
- Activity 3.6: Text: “Letter on Thomas Jefferson” by John Adams. Lexile-1010. Qualitative: Moderate. Task Demand: Moderate-Analyze
- Activity 3.11: Text: “The First Americans” by Scott H. Peters. Lexile-1000. Qualitative: Moderate. Task Demand: Challenging-Evaluate.
In Unit 4, three of four anchor texts have an overall text complexity analysis of complex to very complex.
- Activity 4.8: Text:”The Southpaw” by Judith Viorst. Lexile-660. Qualitative: Moderate. Task Demand: Moderate-Analyze.
- Activity 4.3: Text: “Shakespeare’s Life” by The British Library. Lexile-1390. Qualitative: High. Task Demand: Accessible-Understand.
Indicator 1d
Materials support students' increasing literacy skills over the course of the school year. (Series of texts should be at a variety of complexity levels appropriate for the grade band.)
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the criteria for supporting students’ increasing literacy skills over the course of the school year. (Series of texts should be at a variety of complexity levels appropriate for the grade band.) Series of texts are at a variety of complexity levels appropriate for the grade band.
Texts support students' increasing literacy skills over the course of the school year. The overall reading and writing demands gradually increase in complexity and challenges over the course of the school year as they incorporate previously-taught components and move students to synthesize literacy skills.Students progressively build literacy skills through work with a variety of texts over the course of the school year. Texts sets are at various complexity levels, quantitatively and qualitatively, and therefore support learners as they develop literacy skills and background knowledge to support independent and proficient reading practices.
The overall reading and writing demands start at an accessible range in Unit 1 and gradually increase in complexity and challenges over the course of the school year. This range includes measures of quantitative and qualitative demand. In Unit 1, five of six texts have an overall text complexity analysis of complex, using qualitative and quantitative measures, indicating texts are in the upper range of suggested 6th grade complexity. In Unit 2, three of four texts have an overall text complexity analysis of complex, using qualitative and quantitative measures, indicating texts are in the upper range of suggested 6th grade complexity. In Unit 3, eight of eleven texts have an overall text complexity analysis of complex, using qualitative and quantitative measures indicating texts are in upper range of suggested 6th grade complexity. The remaining three texts have an overall analysis of very complex. In Unit 4, three of four texts have an overall text complexity analysis of complex, using qualitative and quantitative measures indicating texts are in upper range of suggested 6th grade complexity.
Further student supports online allow students to access texts audibly. Print and online student editions provide grammar handbooks, explaining language standards, as well as a variety of reading and writing strategy explanations. The print and online teacher edition contains these resources as well, along with teaching tips, resources, and suggestions, such as extra grammar lessons, Teacher to Teacher tips, and adapt and extend opportunities for ELL, struggling, and advanced students. There are multiple opportunities during collaborative discussions, Literature Circles, and class presentations to practice speaking and listening skills.
Indicator 1e
Anchor texts and series of texts connected to them are accompanied by a text complexity analysis and rationale for purpose and placement in the grade level.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the criteria that anchor texts and series of texts connected to them are accompanied by a text complexity analysis and rationale for purpose and placement in the grade level.
The core texts, and series of texts connected to them, are accompanied by a text complexity analysis and rationale for educational purpose and placement at grade level. The publisher includes a complete “Text Complexity Analysis” for each text used. This document includes a text description, a locator for where it is used, a section on context, a chart of the quantitative and qualitative measures, the qualitative considerations, the task and reader considerations, and the placement considerations.
In the online Teacher Edition, a complete text complexity analysis and rationale for that text's inclusion in the program is available. Included in the text analysis is the following: a paragraph setting the context of the reading within the rest of the unit; a quantitative/complexity measure; qualitative considerations including purpose/levels of meaning, structure, language and knowledge demands; as well as task, reader, and grade level placement considerations.
In the forward of the print Teacher Edition, an explanation of the metrics used for text complexity measures is provided. Quantitative measures are indicated with Lexile scores. Qualitative measures are indicated as "High," "Moderate," and "Low" difficulty and were determined by teachers considering meaning, purpose, structure, language, and knowledge demands of each text. Task difficulty was measured using Anderson's and Krathwohl's taxonomy based on the cognitive demands of tasks associated with the text.
At the beginning of each unit, the Teacher Edition lists rationale for materials included in the “Planning the Unit” section through Context, College Readiness Standards, and Instructional Practices and Pacing. When texts appear to fall below the grade 6-8 level band, a rationale is provided for justification. In the Print Teacher Edition, Text Complexity Icons and information appear as sidebars alongside the beginning of all prose text in Grade 6 student and teacher editions.
Indicator 1f
Anchor text(s), including support materials, provide opportunities for students to engage in a range and volume of reading to achieve grade level reading.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the criteria that support materials for the core text(s) provide opportunities for students to engage in a range and volume of reading to support their reading at grade level by the end of the school year.
There are numerous opportunities for students to engage in a range and volume of texts throughout the year. Furthermore, students are given many opportunities over the course of school year to practice oral and silent reading fluency, and self-monitor their progress. Materials include a breadth and depth of text types. Student and Teacher Editions contain an extensive list of suggested fiction and nonfiction texts, correlated to each unit’s theme, along with Lexile level, in the front of each unit. Students are instructed at beginning and midpoint of each of four units to select a text from the list, or a similar one of their own, corresponding to unit’s theme. Students keep a Reader’s/Writer’s Notebook through the course of the year’s study. There, they record connections between anchor text and text selected for independent reading. The journal also serves as a repository for self-reflection on the success of reading strategies employed; multiple reading for multiple purposes, rereading, visualizing, and summarizing. The texts provide ample opportunities for students to engage in a range and volume of reading to achieve grade level reading. Additional support is given to struggling readers and English Language learners, as well as extension opportunities for those reading above grade level. Online programs include Desmos and Link, and all selections are available as audio versions for practice of oral fluency.
There are numerous opportunities for students to engage with a range and volume of texts throughout the year both in print and in mixed media. Suggested independent reading texts and support texts, when combined with anchor texts, provide a robust collection of opportunities for students to read broadly and deeply. Texts range in length and form from online articles to plays and novels.
Activity 1.3 in Unit 1 introduces students to independent reading expectations. “Use your Reader/Writer Notebook to create your reading plan and respond to any questions, comments, or reactions you may have to your reading. Your teacher may ask questions about your text, and making notes in your Reader/Writer Notebook will help you answer them.” Students are also asked to record their reading pace in their notebook, monitoring and recording growth.
Access to text is available through a variety of methods. The Teacher Wrap on Springboard Digital gives suggestions and options for instructors to monitor student reading growth by employing reading strategies such as grouping students or reading aloud difficult passages. The Teacher Wrap in Unit 1, Activity 1.5, gives these instructions: “Based on the complexity of the passage and the knowledge of your students, you may choose to conduct first reading a variety of ways; independent, paired, or small group reading, or teacher read aloud. As students are reading, monitor their progress. Be sure they are engaged with the text. Based on the observations you made during first reading, you may decide for the second reading to read aloud certain complex passages, or you may group students differently.”
Criterion 1.2: Alignment to the Standards with Tasks and Questions Grounded in Evidence
Materials provide opportunities for rich and rigorous evidence-based discussions and writing about texts to build strong literacy skills.
The SpringBoard Grade 6 instructional materials meet expectations for alignment to the CCSS with tasks and questions grounded in evidence. Most questions, tasks, and assignments are text-dependent and require students to engage with the text directly and to draw on textual evidence to support both what is explicit as well as valid inferences from the text. The materials contain sets of high quality, sequenced, text-dependent, and text-specific questions with activities that build to a culminating task which integrates skills to demonstrate understanding. Culminating tasks are rich and varied, providing opportunities for students to demonstrate what they know and are able to do in speaking and/or writing over the year. The materials provide frequent opportunities and protocols for evidence-based discussions--small groups, peer-to-peer, whole class-- that encourage the modeling and use of academic vocabulary and syntax, and most materials support students’ listening and speaking about what they are reading and researching (including presentation opportunities) with relevant follow-up questions and evidence. The instructional materials also include instruction of grammar and conventions and are applied in increasingly sophisticated contexts with opportunities for application context. The materials include a mix of on-demand and process writing ; short, focused projects incorporating digital resources where appropriate; and frequent opportunities for evidence-based writing to support analyses, well-defended claims, and clear information appropriate to the grade level. The program provides a variety of opportunities for students to write in the modes of argument, explanation, and narrative with writing assignments connected to texts and/or text sets.
Indicator 1g
Most questions, tasks, and assignments are text-dependent, requiring students to engage with the text directly (drawing on textual evidence to support both what is explicit as well as valid inferences from the text).
The instructional materials for Grade 6 meet the criteria that most questions, tasks, and assignments are text-dependent, and require students to engage with the text directly. The questions and tasks require the students to draw on textual evidence, and often support students working with questions that ask students to make inferences.
Teacher materials provide support for planning and implementation of text-dependent writing, speaking, and other activities. Every anchor and supporting text has a Second Read component that asks students to look at a particular section of the text and complete a text-dependent activity. Questions students have about the text are recorded daily in students-required Reader’s/Writer’s notebook. The Teacher Wrap in both online and print teacher’s editions provides extensive guidance to teachers. Students record, revise, and edit their responses digitally with online text, and are encouraged to use digital tools such as Highlight, Note, Mark, Annotate, and Question to help with understanding. Further support is provided to students digitally through Zinc and Desmos.
- In Activity 1.2, students read “The Circut” by Fransisco Jimenez and are asked, “ On page 6 and 7, Jiménez describes the family’s departure. What do the details of the family’s departure help you understand? Cite evidence from the text to support your answer.” There are additional Scaffolding the Text-Dependent Questions such as, “How does the ending to this story reinforce your understanding of the life of migrant workers? Cite evidence from the text to support your answer. To support students in answering this question, review the sequence of events for this narrative. How did it begin and how is the ending similar?”
- In Unit 2, students read the novel, Walk Two Moons, by Sharon Creech, or an optional novel of the teacher’s choice. The culminating task for the unit asks students to pick from the following writing prompts: "Explain how internal or external forces cause one character to grow or change; Identify one subplot from the novel and explain how it relates to the main subplot of the novel; Describe one setting from the novel and explain why it is important to a character or plot; or Discuss how plot, setting, characters, or conflict contributes to one of the novel’s themes."
- In Activity 3.4, students read the text, “Most Dangerous ‘Sport’ of All May Be Cheerleading” by Lisa Ling and Arash Ghadishah. Students are asked questions such as, “ What kinds of evidence do the authors use in the beginning of this article to convey the idea that cheerleading is dangerous?” and “How do the comments from cheerleaders in paragraphs 13–17 contribute to the idea that cheerleading should have uniform safety and training standards?”
- In Activity 4.11, students read the text, The Millionaire Misor by Aaron Shepard and are asked questions such as, "At the end of the story, how does Sushil feel about Nirmala making dumplings for the entire town?" and "Which details in the drama show the reader how Sushil feels? What is the story’s theme? Choose details from the text (e.g., events) and explain how they contribute to the development of the theme."
Indicator 1h
Sets of high-quality sequences of text-dependent questions and tasks build to a culminating task that integrates skills (may be writing, speaking, or a combination).
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 6 partially meet the criteria for materials containing sets of high-quality sequences of text-dependent and text-specific questions with activities that build to a culminating task which integrates skills to demonstrate understanding.
The following are samples representative of the Embedded Assessments in the Grade 6 resources. Skills development, particularly in writing, is strong. Materials refer to culminating tasks as Embedded Assessments. Students are exposed to the demands of these assessments at beginning and midpoint of each unit, and there is extensive support throughout the unit for students at all levels. Culminating tasks connect with texts consistently, although the central focus of these productions does not always privilege the learning within the texts. Connections to the texts studied are not always explicit or robust:
- In Unit 1, Embedded Assessment 1.2: Write a short story. This culminating task is supported by activities that require students to use textual evidence in the analysis of characterization, story and plot elements, and theme. Students also work to create text in response to various writing prompts and demonstrate command of short story techniques, sequencing, and language. After analyzing short stories, students create their own. While this task is connected to the skills of the unit, the materials do not make explicit connections between the assessment and the associated texts.
- In Unit 2, Embedded Assessment 2.1: Write an expository response to literature that addresses a given prompt. This task is supported through a variety of text-dependent activities, such as the writing of paragraph responses to prompts; use of a double-entry journal to practice recording textual evidence to support their analysis of character, plot, subplot, and setting, as well as make meaning from text; close reading activities and strategy focus; and collaborative discussions about literature using Literature Circles. To hold students accountable, the Teacher Wrap suggests that teachers decide how and when they will monitor students’ journal writing and to check periodically for completion. Other suggestions and practices suggested in Teacher Wrap: Check students’ graphic organizers to evaluate if students are identifying key plot events and making reasonable predictions about character change; Assess students’ understanding of how the setting relates to the theme of the novel by checking students’ writing prompt responses; Monitor collaborative discussion and assess the students’ ability to provide detail from the text in response to questions.
- In Unit 3, Embedded Assessment 3.1: Research and Debate Controversy. Students are supported to complete this culminating task through their prior selection of independent reading on a controversial issue, their identification of a writer’s claim and reasons for or against an issue, and their practice presenting information and supporting evidence.
- In Unit 4, Embedded Assessment 4.1: Research and Present Shakespeare. Students are able to complete this culminating task through activities that focus on learning about Shakespeare and his plays. Tasks include debating about the importance of teaching Shakespeare in school, using evidence from texts to support their claim, analyzing information about Shakespeare and his society, analyzing language by looking at quotes from various plays and poems, and presenting information.
Indicator 1i
Materials provide frequent opportunities and protocols for evidencebased discussions that encourage the modeling and use of academic vocabulary and syntax. (May be small group and all-class.)
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 6 partially meet the criteria for materials providing frequent opportunities and protocols for evidence-based discussions (small groups, peer-to-peer, whole class) that encourage the modeling and use of academic vocabulary and syntax.
Students are provided opportunities for collaborative discussion using pair-share, small group discussion, jigsaw, whole class discussion, and Socratic seminars; however, discussion protocol and clear teacher guidance is not evident. Strategies are listed and defined. There is little guidance or direction for teachers and students. Strong guidance regarding the utilization of academic vocabulary and syntax is not present.Each unit offers opportunities to engage with academic vocabulary in three separate differentiated lessons associated with the texts of the unit as well as in preliminary activities where students create a QHT (Questions, Heard, Teach) chart for the academic vocabulary they will encounter in the unit, which are provided in the Contents section of each unit. While academic and content specific vocabulary is listed in the beginning of each unit, and definitions are provided at point of use and in glossaries in the student and teacher edition, with audio available in Springboard Digital, the focus on vocabulary building resides in the process and does not focus deeply into apply academic vocabulary in a larger context. Additionally, to support ELL students, teachers are provided a list of cognates for the unit in the Planning the Unit section of their text and in Springboard Digital, and the textbook contains a glossary with first the English word and definition followed by its Spanish counterpart.
Examples of opportunities for evidence-based discussions include, but are not limited to:- In Unit 1, Activity 1.1 “Preview Academic Vocabulary and Literary Terms,” students are introduced to QHT, a strategy for thinking about their own understanding of vocabulary words. The letters stand for Question, Heard, and Teach. Students are to mark each of their vocabulary words with either a Q, H, or T. Q-words the student may have seen but are not sure of meaning. H-words they have heard before, but not know well. T-words the students know so well they could teach them to someone else. After marking words, students who marked a Q of H find other students who marked a T for that word, and the student who marked a T will teach them the meaning. There is no evidence of how teachers will encourage students to engage with this Academic Vocabulary in future text-based discussions or practice teaching these words after the culmination of this Lesson.
- In Unit 2, Activity 2.7: Roles of Literature Circle groups defines norms and rules for discussion groups as speakers and listeners and assigns the different roles: Timekeeper, Notetaker, Task Manager, Referee, Motivator. Examples of leveled questions provided: Level 1- Literal Level 2- Interpretive Level 3- Universal. Graphic organizer introduced that sorts group evidence into point made and evidence provided. Class discussions lead to guidelines and norms for literature circles. There is no evidence of how teachers will encourage students to engage with this Academic Vocabulary within this Lesson.
- In Unit 3, Activity 3.4 students are asked, " What is your opinion on a limit to full-speed hitting in youth football? Write your claim and reasoning in the My Notes section next to the most effective evidence in the text that supports it. Share your response in a collaborative group discussion." No further direction or guidance is provided.
- In Unit 4, Activity 4.5 students are given limited guidance during Planning to Present Research. Students are directed that when you are a speaker to, "come to the discussion prepared, use appropriate eye contact, adequate volume, and clear pronunciation, and to form and respond to specific questions relating to the topic under discussion." No other guidance is provided.
Indicator 1j
Materials support students' listening and speaking about what they are reading and researching (including presentation opportunities) with relevant follow-up questions and supports.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 6 partially meet the expectations for indicator 1j. Materials supporting students’ listening and speaking about what they are reading and researching (including presentation opportunities) with relevant follow-up questions and supports. In every speaking and listening activity, the students are asked to use evidence from the text at hand, although main ideas and core themes may not be explored consistently.
Materials develop students' skills with focused discussions such as Socratic Seminars and Literature Circles, in which students participate in speaking and listening that is grounded in their reading and researching, and although the students are asked to use evidence from the text at hand, main ideas and core themes are not consistently explored.
Speaking and listening tasks and activities in the Grade 6 materials include active listening, audience, choral reading, clarity of pronunciation and speaking voice, debate, philosophical chairs, drama games, expert group, eye contact, facial expression, feedback, fishbowl strategy, group discussions, inflection, jigsaw group, literature circles, movement, multimedia presentations, oral interpretation, oral introduction, oral presentation, oral reading, pantomime, props, rate, reader's theater, rehearsal, role playing, sound, tableau, tone, visuals, and volume. The index directs students to where they can find text references and instruction of speaking and listening skills.
Although each activity is intended to be anchored by the text, it is noted that there is little accountability for teachers to support students who either do not comprehend the material and/or who work with the speaking and listening activities without referencing the text.
- In Unit 1, Activity 1.6c, students will ask and answer questions about a personal narrative in collaborative groups, demonstrating active listening and drawing upon an expanding pool of language resources for discussing literature, as well as express and support opinion of the personal narrative in discussion groups. Teacher support strategies are modeled in Teacher Wrap found on Springboard Digital, "Teacher models 'What text evidence backs up your answer?'”
- In Unit 2, Activity 2.7 “Questions and Discussions,” the Learning Target is to use verbal and nonverbal communication when posing and responding to literal, interpretive, and universal questions about Walk Two Moons. Students will identify and implement effective discussion techniques to engage in literary analysis in preparation for the Embedded Assessment in which they will write an essay responding to a prompt. During this lesson, norms and roles for Discussion Groups are set for speakers and listeners. Groups rotate to collaborate on various levelled questions from the story and the Teacher Wrap provides support and differentiated instructional strategies. Graphic Organizer asks students to record interesting points made by members of their group, along with text evidence and their own thoughts. Students self-reflect by asking themselves what were challenges, and how can talking and working with others help understanding. The teacher assesses students by monitoring fishbowl discussions, assessing students’ ability to provide details from the text as well as personal commentary in response to questions.
- Activity 2.10: Synthesize the literary elements of Walk Two Moons in order to create a collaborative visual presentation. In a collaborative group, students compare and contrast their visualizations of conflicts of the two main characters in the novel.
- Activity 2.11 Literature Circles: Teacher assigns roles and places students in Literature Circle groups, and supports struggling students by giving them a shorter, more accessible story to practice their roles.
- Activity 2.12: Students write a paragraph explaining how communication and collaboration with their Literature Circle group helped them understand, appreciate, and analyze novel.
- In Unit 3, Activity 3.4, students participate in an effective debate by using evidence from texts, contributing ideas clearly, and responding to others’ ideas. The Teacher Wrap offers support for students who are having difficulty with text demands in the form of scaffolding, chunking, and phrasing questions. The teacher provides clear rules for debate with graphic organizers to record speaker's main points.
- Activity 3.8: Present a position in a debate using evidence from research, contributing ideas clearly and responding to other’s ideas. The Teacher Wrap suggests discussion protocols to reinforce practice of taking turns when sharing and responding in collaborative groups.Students who have difficulty can practice by examining and answering questions in pairs using sentence starters.
- In the Unit 3 Embedded Assessment 2: Work collaboratively and participate in a modified debate that incorporates a visual presentation. Scoring Rubric provided.
- In Unit 4, Activity 4.2, students participate in a class debate, evaluating other speakers’ arguments to be sure their claims are supported by reasons and evidence.
- Embedded Assessment 1: Students work collaboratively to conduct research, synthesize findings, and make a five minute presentation that incorporates multimedia elements.
- Embedded Assessment 2: Performance of a scene from a Shakespeare play and does not analyze the content or meaning.
Indicator 1k
Materials include a mix of on-demand and process writing (e.g. multiple drafts, revisions over time) and short, focused projects, incorporating digital resources where appropriate.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the criteria that materials include a mix of on-demand and process writing throughout each unit in a variety of styles, formats, and lengths.
Grade 6 materials contain a mix of on-demand and process writing opportunities for students. Each unit has a culminating activity that focuses on the steps of the writing process. Materials include writing instruction aligned to the standards for the grade level, and writing instruction spans the whole school year.
On-demand opportunities include daily writing options in class instruction as well as opportunities in every unit to attend to the text at hand. Some examples representative of the program as a whole include:
- In Unit 1, Activity 1.7, after reading an excerpt from Flipped and using a graphic organizer to prewrite about an incident in their life that was witnessed by someone else, students will respond to a narrative writing prompt. The prompt asks students to write about the incident in a way that shows the differing attitudes about what happened, making sure to establish the incident, create dialogue that incorporates the feelings of the characters, use descriptive language, and correctly use proper nouns and pronouns.
- In Unit 2, Activities 2.2-2.3, students are introduced to several expository writing prompts and practice writing paragraph responses. Students work with classmates to write a response to a film clip from UP that explains character's life changes in response to internal forces, including a topic sentence that states the main idea, supporting details from graphic organizer, and commentary.
Process opportunities are woven throughout the program, and by the end of the year, students have had robust support in learning and working with the writing process. Multiple opportunities require short and extended research. Mode-specific Writing Workshops are in the online teacher's edition, which include open-ended prompts and Embedded Assessments with scoring guides to provide regular practice. The student edition includes writing instruction such as brainstorming, controlling idea, details, dialogue, drafting, editing, evaluating, feedback, outlining, planning, prewriting, quickwrites, research, revision strategies, multimedia components, writing process, and writing prompts. The Planning Unit section of the teacher’s edition provides an explanation of expectations of Embedded Assessments, as well as a comprehensive Instruction and Pacing Guide. A Writer's Workshop is available online for extra support.
Indicator 1l
Materials provide opportunities for students to address different text types of writing that reflect the distribution required by the standards.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the criteria for materials providing opportunities for students to address different text types of writing that reflect the distribution required by the standards and may include blended styles.
Grade 6 materials provide opportunities for students to address different text types of writing that reflects the distribution required by the standards over the course of a school year. Embedded Assessments (2 per unit) cover a wide variety of writing activities which meet 6th grade level standards. Some examples include writing a personal narrative, writing a short story, responding to literature, writing an expository essay, researching and debating a controversy, writing an argumentative letter, and researching and presenting written work on Shakespeare.
Writing lessons and activities that represent this distribution of text types include the following examples:
- In Unit 1, writing instruction includes writing a personal narrative and writing a short story. Language and writer's craft instruction includes transitions, revising for transitions, vivid verbs, and varied sentence patterns.
- In Unit 2, writing instruction includes responding to literature and writing an expository essay. Language and writer's craft instruction includes pronoun usage and agreement, sentence variety, revising for figurative language, and parallel structure.
- In Unit 3, ELA instruction includes researching and debating a controversy and writing an argumentative letter. Language and writer's craft instruction includes format style, using appositives, and revising by creating complex sentences.
- In Unit 4, ELA instruction includes researching, presenting, and performing Shakespeare. Language and writer's craft instruction includes choosing sentence structure and pronoun usage.
Indicator 1m
Materials include frequent opportunities for evidence-based writing to support careful analyses, well-defended claims, and clear information.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the criteria for materials including frequent opportunities for research-based and evidence-based writing to support analysis, argument, synthesis and/or evaluation of information, supports, and claims.
Grade 6 materials provide frequent opportunities for evidence-based writing to support careful analyses, well-defended claims, and clear information appropriate for the grade level. Evidence-based responses are required as follow up activities for all reading selections. Materials provide frequent opportunities throughout the school year for students to learn, practice, and apply their new knowledge in writing. Writing tasks often reference the reading content and mode in which the reading was presented. As students study a text for form and content, students are provided prompts and guidance to identify the components and then practice replicating or analyzing those components.
Across the consumable student edition, there are graphic organizers and note-taking prompts to assist students in producing writing associated with the texts being read. Prompts include questions that are dependent to the text, but used with multiple texts as well as text-specific writing demands. In the sidebars, students are provided organized space and guidance to annotate and collect evidence to use in the writing tasks at the ends of each text and/or section. This progression of working from reading to note-taking to organizer to frame to writing is common throughout the program.
Most writing tasks explicitly require students to cite components as students write, even in low-stakes annotations and note taking that occur almost daily. Cues such as "record evidence" and "cite phrases" occur throughout to build students' habits of going back to the text. Examples include, but are not limited to:
- In Unit 1, Activities 1.4-1.7, students "record evidence of setting, character, conflict, and dialogue from film and personal narratives" as they engage with them.
- In Unit 2, Activities 2.4-2.7, students use a double-entry journal as a primary tool for identifying relevant textual evidence on characterization, plot and subplot, and setting, addressing Response to Literature prompts. Also in Activities 2.16-2.17, students practice writing an expository essay that incorporates examples from text and research to support a thesis.
- In Unit 4, Embedded Assessment 4.1, students support a focused main idea with relevant descriptions, facts, and details from a variety of sources, including a complete and accurate bibliography or works cited page.
Indicator 1n
Materials include explicit instruction of the grammar and conventions standards for grade level as applied in increasingly sophisticated contexts, with opportunities for application both in and out of context.
The instructional materials reviewed for Grade 6 meet the criteria for materials including instruction of the grammar and conventions/language standards for grade level as applied in increasingly sophisticated contexts, with opportunities for application context.
Language skills are taught explicitly and then applied in increasingly sophisticated contexts. Language skills addressed in the materials include active voice, adjectives, adverbs, appositives, clauses, conjunctions, dependent markers, parallel structure/parallelism, phrases, pronouns, punctuation (commas, dashes, exclamation marks, periods, quotation marks, semicolon), repetition, sentence variety, sentences, series, and verbs.
Grammar and conventions are taught in a sequence consistent with the demands of Grade 6 standards and are integrated with reading and writing instruction. Language standards for the grade level are found in forward of student edition. A comprehensive grammar handbook is in the back of the book for continual reference, as well as an Index of Language Skills identifying where instruction can be found in text. This handbook can also be found in both the student and teacher online editions. The Teacher Resources Online also have additional grammar lessons. In addition, there are ten separate Writer's Workshops online that incorporate grammar and language instruction. The Planning the Unit section at the beginning of each unit, in teacher's print edition, lists expectations for Embedded Assessments as well as a comprehensive Instructional Activity and Pacing Guide that provides grammar support and instruction in the context of actual reading and writing. English Learners and struggling students are supported by Language Checkpoints in each unit, as well as specifically designed lessons in Academic Language, Close Reading, Text Interpretation and Collaborative Discussions. Language Checkpoints are found in each unit, that address specific grammar or syntax skills.
Examples include the following:
- In Unit 1, Activities 1.4-1.7, students practice command of conventions through Language and Writer's Craft lesson on commas, reflexive and intensive pronouns, and dialogue punctuation. Language Checkpoint 1.5 focuses on punctuating complete sentences. Students will understand the difference between complete sentences and sentence fragments, revising writing to use fragments appropriately for effect. Activities 1.8-1.10: Language and Writer's Craft focus on using transitions. Activities 1.13-1.17: Language and Writer's Craft lessons support students' use of varied sentence patterns to add variety and interest to writing, as well as use of indefinite and possessive pronouns. At the end of the unit, the Embedded Assessment 1.2: Write a Short Story, asks students to use a variety of transitions. "Use precise words and sensory details (vivid verbs, figurative language). Demonstrate command of pronoun use, sentence variety, dialogue punctuation."
- In Unit 2, Activities 2.2-2.3: Language and Writer's Craft, the lessons teach students to use appropriate verb tenses. Activities 2.4-2.6: Continued writing practice gives students opportunities to use appropriate transitions and demonstrate correct verb tense and pronoun use. Lessons on sentence variety show students how to revise using compound sentences. Language Checkpoint 2.4 focuses on noun agreement. Activities 2.7-2.10: Language and Writer's Craft lessons revisit specific figurative language techniques from Unit 1. In the middle of the unit, Embedded Assessment 2.1: Write a Response to Literature, asks students to use a variety of transitions and topic sentences to create coherence. "Use precise, accurate diction to illustrate the topic and demonstrate command of parallel structures, commas in a series, and semicolons." In Activities 2.16-2.17, as modeled in Language and Writer's Craft lesson on parallel structures, students compose sentences, paying attention to variety.
- In Unit 3, Embedded Assessment 3.1: Research and Debate a Controversy, students are asked to demonstrate command of the conventions of standard English. Activities 3.11-3.13: Language and Writer's Craft lesson ask students to use appositives as an effective way to cite sources. In Activities 3.14-3.15, students draft and revise writing by using transitions and creating complex sentences. At the end of the unit, Embedded Assessment 3.2: Write an Argumentative Letter, asks students to use a variety of transitions, persuasive and connotative diction and demonstrate command of the conventions of standard English.
- In Unit 4, Activities 4.3-4.4: In the Language and Writer's Craft lessons, students continue to practice using a variety of sentence structures as they collaboratively write an explanation of information gained from research. In the middle of the unit, Embedded Assessment 4.1: Research and Present a Portrait of Shakespeare, asks students to "maintain appropriate style and tone, consistently use academic and literary vocabulary. Demonstrate a command of the conventions of standard English, including a variety of syntax." In Activities 4.9-4.10, correct pronoun usage is revisited and reinforced through Language and Writer's Craft lessons. At the end of the unit, Embedded Assessment 4.2: Perform Shakespeare, asks students to use punctuation cues ( periods, commas, semicolons, dashes, exclamation points) accurately and consistently to inform vocal delivery.