2016
Eureka Math

High School - Gateway 1

Back to High School Overview
Cover for Eureka Math
Note on review tool versions

See the series overview page to confirm the review tool version used to create this report.

Loading navigation...

Gateway Ratings Summary

Focus & Coherence

Gateway 1 - Meets Expectations
83%
Criterion 1.1: Focus & Coherence
15 / 18

Criterion 1.1: Focus & Coherence

15 / 18

Focus and Coherence: The instructional materials are coherent and consistent with "the high school standards that specify the mathematics which all students should study in order to be college and career ready" (p. 57 of CCSSM).

The instructional materials reviewed meet the expectations for focus and coherence. The materials attend to the full intent of the mathematical content contained in the high school standards for all students, but they partially attend to the full intent of the modeling process. The materials, when used as designed, allow students to spend the majority of their time on the WAPs, but due to extensions beyond the non-plus standards, the materials partially allow students to fully learn each standard. The materials do engage students in the mathematics at a level of sophistication appropriate to high school; make meaningful connections in a single course and throughout the series; and identify and build on knowledge from Grades 6-8 to the high school standards.

Narrative Only
Narrative Only
Narrative Only

Indicator 1a

Narrative Only

The materials focus on the high school standards.*

Indicator 1a.i

4 / 4

The materials attend to the full intent of the mathematical content contained in the high school standards for all students.

The materials meet the expectation for attending to the full intent of the mathematical content contained in the high school standards for all students. For standards that span across a course or series, the development of the standard within a course and across the series was examined to determine if all aspects of the standard were addressed. Some specific examples where the materials attend to all aspects of a standard either within a course or across the series are shown below.

F-IF.4: The materials fully develop F-IF.4 through the course of four modules and extending into a fifth module. In Algebra I, the standard is developed for linear, quadratic and exponential functions including modeling opportunities. The materials further develop this standard in Algebra II from the foundation provided through previous learning experiences in Algebra I. In Algebra II, this standard is extended to trigonometric and logarithmic functions. It would be helpful if the materials identified the intended standard at the lesson level rather than just at the topic level. (Note: student books do not identify standards at all.) Courses are organized into modules, topics and then lessons. F-IF.4 is addressed in multiple locations, shown below, across Algebra I and II.

  • Algebra I, module 3: topics B and D

  • Algebra I, module 4: topics A and B

  • Algebra I, module 5: topics A and B

  • Algebra II, module 2: F-IF.4 is not explicitly noted in the teacher guide, but numerous opportunities to identify key features from a table, graph or context are noted throughout this module.

  • Algebra II, module 3: topic C

G-CO.1: This standard was fully developed in module 1, topics A and G, for all concepts listed in the standard. The module started with students completing constructions to develop precise definitions of angle, circle, perpendicular line, parallel line and line segment. Students are asked to recall, compare, and expand upon geometric definitions from previous grades (Grades 4-8). Then students are asked to make conjectures and write proofs. As students progress through the module they extend this knowledge in developing definitions of rotations, reflections, and translations. (G-CO.4).

A-SSE.2: This standard is fully developed over the span of three modules: in Algebra I, module 1, topic B and module 4, topic A, then in Algebra II, module 1, topics A and B.

  • In the Algebra I modules, students use and develop the concepts of algebraic properties by rewriting expressions and looking at patterns, such as the distributive and associative properties. Then, in module 4, students use the properties of exponents to support the development of understanding and procedures for multiplication of polynomials and factoring.

  • In Algebra II, students expand on these concepts from Algebra I and extend them to higher degree polynomial operations and algebraic manipulations. Each series of lessons begins by having students focus on rewriting polynomials or decomposing numbers to identify patterns and then expanding upon those patterns to construct new understandings.

For teachers utilizing these materials, note that some standards are addressed more fully in the teacher discussion notes, and routine use of the teacher discussion notes is essential. Otherwise, there is the potential for some standards to receive superficial treatment. For example, the discussion notes on page 16 of the teacher edition for Algebra II, module 2, lesson 1, suggest that the teacher have students review and explain their thinking and consider revisions to the methods used in completing exploratory challenge 1 as they gain greater understanding of F-IF.7 and F-TF.5. Without using these teacher notes, the students may not necessarily have the opportunity to engage with all aspects of these two standards.

There were a few assessments which tested material before it was actually addressed.

  • In the Algebra I, module 1, mid-module assessment, A-SSE.1a and A-SSE.1b were not covered in the material but were on the assessment and a part of the rubric.

  • In Algebra II, module 2, F-TF.3 and F-LE.2 were tested in the mid-year assessment but not covered until the second half of the module. These standards were re-assessed at the end of the module.

  • In Algebra II, module 4, S-CP.3 was assessed in the mid-module assessment but not covered until the second half of the book.

Indicator 1a.ii

1 / 2

The materials attend to the full intent of the modeling process when applied to the modeling standards.

The materials partially meet the expectation for attending to the full intent of the modeling process when applied to the modeling standards. The review identified multiple units and assessment items across the series where the modeling standards are addressed to varying levels. There are some modeling standards for which the opportunities for student engagement in the modeling process do not meet what is intended as described in the CCSSM for high school mathematics: “Modeling is the process of choosing and using appropriate mathematics and statistics to analyze empirical situations, to understand them better, and to improve decisions.” The CCSSM further describes modeling as having attributes such as choice, decision-making, creativity, estimation, drawing and validating conclusions, design and re-design, as well as reasoning and communicating.

In addressing the modeling standards, many lessons limited students to analyzing relationships presented by the teacher or materials, reflecting on results and making adjustments, if needed. Many lessons were structured with learning opportunities that were teacher-led and contained step-by-step instructions for students with minimal opportunities for creativity, estimation and student choice of math concepts and skills to combine and utilize for problem solving. Examples of modeling standards where the full intent of the modeling process was not met include the following:

A-CED.3 was addressed in Algebra I, module 1, topic C. The lessons start by leading students to solve problems using a specific method utilizing provided graphs, tables and fill-in-the-blank equations. The lessons are teacher-led and then move to more open-ended questions that ask students to utilize some components of the modeling process. The students experience the modeling process in a highly-structured manner by following predetermined steps disclosed by the teacher or the materials. If the early lessons of Algebra I, module 1, were amended by placing the tables, graphs and other modeling hints or directives in the teacher notes as facilitation guidelines, then students would have the opportunity to engage with the full intent the modeling process.

A-CED.4 was addressed in Algebra I, module 1, topic C, lesson 19. This lesson is constructed as a teacher-led lesson containing non-contextual problems, falling short of attending to the modeling process.

F-LE.1a, F-LE.1b and F-LE.1c were addressed in Algebra I, module 3, topic A or module 5, topics A and B. Students compared graphs and equations and wrote equations, but student actions were directed by the teacher and/or materials with little opportunity for student choice, creativity, design or re-design. Some modeling components were completed by the students, but some questions were exclusively in the teacher notes and not in the student activity. Without using the teacher notes, the students may not necessarily have the opportunity to engage in the full modeling process with these standards.

F-LE.4 was addressed in Algebra II, module 3-topics B, C and D. The exit tickets have modeling questions for students, but the actual lessons are teacher-led and scaffolded leaving little in the way of possibilities for multiple solution pathways.

There were lessons where the materials did attend to the full intent of the modeling process when applied to modeling standards. Two examples describing those lessons are shown below.

In Geometry, module 3, lesson 1 provides an exploration to find out how much paint is needed to cover an oval area where different approaches are used to determine the area of the figure. The students use the modeling process in order to determine an approach that is appropriate for working with an oval. Students compare and contrast different approaches to calculate the area of the figure and how much paint is needed. This exploration is used as the materials begin to lay the foundation for G-GMD.3 in topic B of the module.

In Algebra II, module 2, lessons 1 and 2 use physical models (a paper plate) and mathematical models (graphs) to represent and explore the real world situation of the height of a passenger car on a Ferris wheel. Students are prompted to create a sketch of the height of a passenger car on a Ferris wheel as it rotates four times. The way in which the challenge is presented allows students to make some decisions and assumptions as they begin to complete the challenge. Ensuing questions and discussion allow for additional student choices and re-designs in order to find a better model or to make the model meet new information, for example a specific diameter. The execution of the questions in the teacher notes and ensuing discussions help to provide the full intent of the modeling process in these lessons.

Indicator 1b

Narrative Only

The materials provide students with opportunities to work with all high school standards and do not distract students with prerequisite or additional topics.

Indicator 1b.i

2 / 2

The materials, when used as designed, allow students to spend the majority of their time on the content from CCSSM widely applicable as prerequisites for a range of college majors, postsecondary programs, and careers.

The materials meet the expectations for, when used as designed, allowing students to spend the majority of their time on the content from CCSSM widely applicable as prerequisites (WAPs) for a range of college majors, postsecondary programs, and careers. Overall, the series does devote a majority of instructional time to the WAPs.

Algebra I contains five modules of instruction, and three of the modules are almost completely focused on the WAPs. Most of the WAPs are addressed in the Algebra I instructional materials, and the WAPs primarily addressed in the Algebra I materials are the non-plus standards from A-CED and F-IF.

  • A-CED is addressed in topics C and D of module 1; topic D of module 3; topics A, B, and C of module 4; and topics A and B of module 5.

  • F-IF is addressed in topics A, B, C and D of module 3; topics A, B, and C of module 4; and topics A and B of module 5.

All of the lessons within Geometry address standards from the Geometry category, and although topics were addressed that could be considered part of a 4th-year course, these lessons were not distracting from the time spent on the WAPs. The WAPs from the Geometry category are largely addressed in the first two modules of the Geometry materials, and the Geometry materials, as a whole, do spend a majority of time on the WAPs from the Geometry category.

  • G-CO.A is a part of topics A, C and G of module 1.

  • G-CO.B is a part of topics C, D and G of module 1.

  • C-CO.9,10 are found in topics B, E and G of module 1.

  • G-SRT.A,B,C are found in topics A, B, C, D and E of module 2.

In reviewing the Algebra II instructional materials, most of the lessons aligned to the WAPs. Although topics were addressed that could be considered part of a 4th-year course, these lessons were not distracting from the time spent on the WAPs. The WAPs are largely addressed in the first and third modules of the Algebra II materials, and the Algebra II materials, as a whole, do spend a majority of time on the WAPs.

  • A-SSE is included in topics A and B of module 1 and topics D and E of module 3.

  • F-IF is addressed in topic B of module 1; topics A and B of module 2; and topics A, C, D and E of module 3.

  • F-BF.1 is included in topics A, B, C, D and E of module 3.

Indicator 1b.ii

2 / 4

The materials, when used as designed, allow students to fully learn each standard.

The materials partially meet the expectation for allowing students to fully learn each standard, when used as designed. Overall, the materials provide limited opportunities for students to engage with some standards, and some materials are distracting as they extend beyond the non-plus standards.

Standards with multiple components, such as A-REI.4 and A-REI.11, were examined carefully within the materials. There were instances within the series where standards with multiple components were addressed through a series of lessons or revisited across the series, building logically toward full depth of understanding for all students. However, for some standards, a series of lessons or revisiting a standard across the series did not occur. Examples of standards that have a limited number of opportunities for students to engage with the standard in a focused manner are:

  • In Algebra I, module 3, lessons 8 through 10 focus on standards F-IF.1,2. These two standards include the formal definition of a function, the use and interpretation of function notation, and the graph of a function, f, is the graph of the equation y = f(x). These three lessons represent a limited opportunity for students to focus on and fully learn F-IF.1,2 as they pertain to all types of functions.

  • In Algebra II, module 1, a series of six lessons addresses standards within A-REI, culminating in a lesson on solving simple rational equations (A-REI.2). The series of lessons follows a logical progression through simplifying rational expressions; adding, subtracting, multiplying and dividing rational expressions; and solving rational equations in mathematical and real-world contexts. The culminating work in solving rational equations is addressed in one lesson. Though the series of lessons addresses the prerequisite skills students would need when solving rational equations, students would have a limited opportunity to fully learn A-REI.2 for rational equations.

There are lessons that include problems which are distracting to students as they extend beyond what is required by the non-plus standards. Examples of where the materials are distracting include, but are not limited to:

  • In lesson 5 of module 2 in the Algebra I materials, students calculate the standard deviation for a set of data by hand, and in lesson 7 of the same module, students use the 1.5 X (IQR) method for determining outliers. These topics extend beyond what is required by standards in S-ID.A.

  • Set-builder notation and pseudocode are included in lessons 11 and 12 of module 3 in the Algebra I materials. These topics extend beyond what is required by standards in F-IF.A.

  • In the middle of lesson 14 of module 3 in Algebra I, the teacher materials introduce and have students discuss geometric mean, but geometric mean is an extension beyond the standards in F-IF which are aligned to the lesson.

  • Points of concurrencies are addressed by lesson 5 of module 1 in Geometry, and these are extensions beyond G-CO.1, G-CO.1.12 and G-CO.1.13, which are the standards aligned to the topic for this lesson.

  • Toward the end of lesson 10 in module 4 of Geometry, the materials have students find the area of a hexagon using coordinates, but this figure is beyond what is in G-GPE.7, which includes finding the area of triangles and rectangles.

  • Lesson 15 of module 4 in Geometry has students develop a formula for the distance that a point is from a line that is given by the equation y = mx + b. The proof that is used to develop the formula extends beyond G-GPE.4 and G-GPE.6 which are the standards aligned to the lesson.

  • During lesson 39 of module 1 in Algebra II, the materials ask students to solve a fourth-degree polynomial that has complex solutions, and this example extends beyond N-CN.7 which includes solving quadratic equations that have complex solutions.

  • Lesson 7 of module 2 in Algebra II addresses the secant, cosecant, and cotangent functions which are extensions beyond any of the non-plus standards in F-TF.

  • Lessons 11-13 of module 3 in the Algebra II materials include various properties of logarithms, problems that involve rewriting logarithmic expressions from one form to another, and justifications of logarithmic properties for all possible values of the base in the logarithmic expression. These topics extend beyond what is required by F-LE.4.

Time requirements for each component of the lessons are specifically noted throughout the teacher materials. The series provides a problem set at the end of every lesson, and class time for working on the problem sets is not included in the timings assigned to the lessons. The problem sets are intended to be utilized as homework assignments, and time for student questions or classroom discussion concerning the problem sets is also not included. The pacing for the course does include time for assessments with return for remediation or further applications.

Indicator 1c

2 / 2

The materials require students to engage in mathematics at a level of sophistication appropriate to high school.

The materials meet the expectation for requiring students to engage in mathematics at a level of sophistication appropriate to high school. Overall, the materials include problems for all students that are appropriate to high school, present contexts that motivate the mathematical content of the high school standards, and use types of numbers that are part of real-world scenarios.

In general, the series expects all students to engage with the materials through similar experiences at a level of sophistication appropriate to high school. There are no indications in the student materials of optional exercises or problem sets for students not ready for the course-level work, but there are some scaffolding notes in the teacher materials. For advanced learners, some lessons provide an extension problem, but when these extensions do exist, there is typically not more than one problem. For example, in Algebra I, module 1, lesson 9, the extension problem is: "Find a polynomial that, when multiplied by 2x^2 + 3x + 1, gives the answer 2x^3 + x^2 - 2x - 1." This is a reasonable extension problem as it stays on course level, and this is the only extension problem provided in the lesson.

Real-world contexts are used throughout the series to motivate the content of the high school standards. In some cases, the contexts are technical but do promote the mathematical content of the context. For example:

  • In Algebra II, module 1, telescopes are used to assist in developing models for parabolas and to provide reasons why parabolic equations are needed.

  • In Geometry, module 3 concludes with a lesson on 3-D printers which is a context that promotes Cavalieri’s principle and the volume of various three-dimensional objects.

  • In Algebra I, module 5, students bring together multiple standards from throughout the course as they solve problems in settings that include fish populations in a lake, investing money, and the concentration of medicine in a patient’s blood.

The numbers included in the instructional materials are appropriate for high school. Types of numbers used within problems do not just consist of positive integers or integers, and answers to problems are not always integers. For example:

  • Lesson 24 of module 4 in Algebra I includes a data set for a problem that has rational numbers in tenths and produces a solution that has rational numbers to the ten-thousandths place.

  • Lesson 33 of module 2 in Geometry uses rational numbers to the hundredths place for lengths of sides and angle measurements that produce irrational results when working with trigonometric functions.

  • Lesson 28 of module 3 in Algebra II uses rational numbers as data points, along with the number e, when discussing Newton’s law of cooling.

Indicator 1d

2 / 2

The materials are mathematically coherent and make meaningful connections in a single course and throughout the series, where appropriate and where required by the Standards.

The materials meet the expectation for fostering coherence through meaningful connections in a single course and throughout the series, where appropriate and where required by the standards.

Examples of connections that are in the series:

  • Solving quadratic equations in Algebra I with solving rational equations in Algebra II;

  • Factoring in Algebra I with radical expressions in Algebra II;

  • Within Algebra I, creating equations that describe relationships with constructing linear and exponential models in modules 3 and 5;

  • The Pythagorean theorem is used in both Geometry and Algebra II;

  • Within Geometry, solving systems of equations with using coordinates to compute perimeters of polygons in topic A of module 4;

  • Operations with radicals from Geometry are used again with radical equations in Algebra II; and

  • Within Algebra II, representing data on two quantitative variables and modeling periodic phenomena with trigonometric functions in topic B of module 2.

The teacher materials communicate connections. Each module begins with an overview, which describes the standards that will be addressed, how those standards are connected to prior learning and how the work will help prepare students for subsequent lessons and courses. This information describes the intended flow of the module. The foundation and extension standards are shown along with new terms, familiar terms and symbols. The facilitator notes for each lesson are thorough and routinely make explicit to the teacher exactly how each example, discussion, activity, etc. connects to previous and subsequent learning. The teacher materials remind the teacher of the "big picture."

Indicator 1e

2 / 2

The materials explicitly identify and build on knowledge from Grades 6--8 to the High School Standards.

The materials meet the expectation for explicitly identifying and building on knowledge from Grades 6-8 to the high school standards. When necessary, the materials reference prior knowledge in the teacher edition of the materials. Each unit across the series, especially for Algebra I and Geometry, identifies the "foundational standards" from Grades 6-8 that underlay the development of concepts in each module in each course. All of the Grades 6-8 standards that are identified as foundational standards in Algebra I and Geometry are standards that are built upon and extended to the high school standards in the high school series. The foundational standards are not explicitly taught within the lessons in the high school series, instead they serve as the basis for extending to the high school standards. These connections to the grades 6-8 standards are made explicitly for teachers, but not for students. The "foundational standards" in Algebra II are all from the Algebra I materials.

Some examples of where the materials connect standards from Grades 6-8 to the high school standards:

  • Algebra I, module 2 is about statistics. The focus standards for this module address number line plots; shapes, centers, and spreads of distributions; categorical data; scatter plots, correlation, and linear regression equations. The Grades 6-8 standards that are identified as foundational for the focus standards include recognizing statistical questions; understanding the shape, center, and spread of a distribution; number line plots; summarizing numerical data sets; constructing scatter plots and estimating trend lines with linear equations. The discussion and work with scatter plots and regression equations do not duplicate what was addressed in middle school, instead the focus moves to to least-squares regression and deeper understanding of correlation.

  • Geometry, module 2 lists familiar terms from previous courses in the teacher edition and notes connections to standards addressed in Grades 6-8 while also discussing how the standards progress in high school. The teacher notes detail how the material/lesson meets the intent of progression. In topic A, the teacher materials explain that, in Grades 6-8 (with a mention of a Grade 4 standard), the purpose was to for students to observe how dilations worked. The expectation in high school is to explain why dilations work.

Indicator 1f

Narrative Only

The plus (+) standards, when included, are explicitly identified and coherently support the mathematics which all students should study in order to be college and career ready.

The plus standards, when included, are explicitly identified and coherently support the mathematics which all students should study in order to be college- and career-ready. These standards are identified in the teacher materials as extension standards at the beginning of the module. The materials do not, however, directly identify these standards at the lesson level. Plus standards within the series include:

  • Geometry, module 2, lessons 31-33 -- G-SRT.9,10,11 are fully addressed by the lessons listed.

  • Geometry, module 3, lessons 10-12 -- G-GMD.2 is fully addressed by the lessons listed.

  • Geometry, module 5, lesson 11 -- G-C.4 is fully addressed by the lesson listed.

  • Algebra II, module 1, lessons 24-25 -- A-APR.7 is not fully addressed by the lessons listed. Closure for the system of rational expressions under the operations of addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division is not addressed.

  • Algebra II, module 1, lessons 39-40 -- N-CN.8,9 are fully addressed by the lessons listed.

  • Algebra II, module 2, lessons 4, 9, 10, and 14 -- F-TF.3 is fully addressed by the lessons listed.

  • Algebra II, module 2, lesson 17 -- F-TF.9 is fully addressed by the lessons listed.

In all instances, these standards were coherently connected to the non-plus standards. In many instances, lessons covering plus standards could be omitted, causing minimal issues in studying concepts found later in the series. For example, Geometry module 2 addresses G-SRT.9, G-SRT.10 and G-SRT.11 in lessons 31-33. These lessons could be used as extension lessons or skipped without disrupting the flow of the material.