Compare Specific Materials

Clear All Filters

Update How Results Are Shown

Agile Mind (2016)

Published By: Agile Mind

| Date Published: 2017/10/18

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Focus & Coherence
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
16/18
16/16
Meets Expectations
31/36
Focus & Coherence
16/18
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
16/16
Usability
31/36

Agile Mind Integrated Mathematics (2019)

Published By: Agile Mind

| Date Published: 2019/12/17

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Focus & Coherence
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
16/18
16/16
Meets Expectations
31/36
Focus & Coherence
16/18
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
16/16
Usability
31/36

AMSCO Math: Algebra 1, Geometry, Algebra 2 (2016)

Published By: Perfection Learning

| Date Published: 2018/07/31

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Focus & Coherence
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
9/18
N/A
Does Not Meet Expectations
N/A
Focus & Coherence
9/18
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
N/A
Usability
N/A

Big Ideas Integrated (2016)

Published By: Big Ideas Learning, LLC

| Date Published: 2016/10/18

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Focus & Coherence
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
9/18
N/A
Does Not Meet Expectations
N/A
Focus & Coherence
9/18
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
N/A
Usability
N/A

Big Ideas Math: A Common Core Curriculum - Algebra 1, Geometry, Algebra 2 (2015)

Published By: Big Ideas Learning, LLC

| Date Published: 2016/10/18

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Focus & Coherence
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
9/18
N/A
Does Not Meet Expectations
N/A
Focus & Coherence
9/18
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
N/A
Usability
N/A

Carnegie Integrated (2012)

Published By: Carnegie Learning

| Date Published: 2016/06/20

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Focus & Coherence
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
10/18
11/16
Partially Meets Expectations
N/A
Focus & Coherence
10/18
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
11/16
Usability
N/A

Carnegie Learning Math Solution Integrated (2018)

Published By: Carnegie Learning

| Date Published: 2019/10/02

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Focus & Coherence
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
16/18
16/16
Meets Expectations
35/36
Focus & Coherence
16/18
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
16/16
Usability
35/36

Carnegie Learning Math Solution Traditional (2018)

Published By: Carnegie Learning

| Date Published: 2019/10/02

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Focus & Coherence
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
16/18
16/16
Meets Expectations
35/36
Focus & Coherence
16/18
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
16/16
Usability
35/36

Carnegie Traditional (2013-2014)

Published By: Carnegie Learning

| Date Published: 2016/06/01

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Focus & Coherence
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
11/18
11/16
Partially Meets Expectations
N/A
Focus & Coherence
11/18
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
11/16
Usability
N/A

CCSS Mathematics Integrated Pathway (2015)

Published By: Walch Education

| Date Published: 2017/03/30

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Focus & Coherence
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
13/18
10/16
Partially Meets Expectations
N/A
Focus & Coherence
13/18
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
10/16
Usability
N/A

CME Traditional (2009)

Published By: Savvas Learning Company (f/k/a Pearson)

| Date Published: 2016/09/08

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Focus & Coherence
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
7/18
N/A
Does Not Meet Expectations
N/A
Focus & Coherence
7/18
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
N/A
Usability
N/A

CORD: Learning in Context (2014)

Published By: CORD Communications

| Date Published: 2018/02/07

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Focus & Coherence
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
5/18
N/A
Does Not Meet Expectations
N/A
Focus & Coherence
5/18
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
N/A
Usability
N/A

Core-Plus Mathematics (2015)

Published By: McGraw-Hill Education

| Date Published: 2016/09/23

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Focus & Coherence
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
15/18
15/16
Meets Expectations
30/36
Focus & Coherence
15/18
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
15/16
Usability
30/36

CPM Integrated (2015)

Published By: CPM Educational Program (CPM)

| Date Published: 2016/09/23

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Focus & Coherence
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
15/18
16/16
Meets Expectations
33/36
Focus & Coherence
15/18
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
16/16
Usability
33/36

CPM Traditional (2015)

Published By: CPM Educational Program (CPM)

| Date Published: 2016/06/01

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Focus & Coherence
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
15/18
16/16
Meets Expectations
31/36
Focus & Coherence
15/18
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
16/16
Usability
31/36

Discovering Mathematics: Algebra, Geometry, Advanced Algebra (2014, 2015, 2017)

Published By: Kendall Hunt Publishing Company

| Date Published: 2018/04/19

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Focus & Coherence
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
15/18
14/16
Meets Expectations
31/36
Focus & Coherence
15/18
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
14/16
Usability
31/36

eMathInstruction Common Core for High School Mathematics (2019)

Published By: eMath Instruction Inc.

| Date Published: 2020/05/07

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Focus & Coherence
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
14/18
10/16
Partially Meets Expectations
N/A
Focus & Coherence
14/18
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
10/16
Usability
N/A

enVision A/G/A (2018)

Published By: Savvas Learning Company (f/k/a Pearson)

| Date Published: 2018/10/24

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Focus & Coherence
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
14/18
15/16
Meets Expectations
30/36
Focus & Coherence
14/18
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
15/16
Usability
30/36

enVision Integrated Mathematics (2020)

Published By: Savvas Learning Company (f/k/a Pearson)

| Date Published: 2020/08/13

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Focus & Coherence
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
14/18
15/16
Meets Expectations
30/36
Focus & Coherence
14/18
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
15/16
Usability
30/36

Eureka Math (2013-2014)

Published By: Great Minds

| Date Published: 2015/03/04

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Focus & Coherence
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
15/18
12/16
Partially Meets Expectations
N/A
Focus & Coherence
15/18
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
12/16
Usability
N/A

FuelEd Florida Summit Math (2018)

Published By: Fuel Education

| Date Published: 2019/07/15

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Focus & Coherence
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
4/18
N/A
Does Not Meet Expectations
N/A
Focus & Coherence
4/18
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
N/A
Usability
N/A

Glencoe Algebra 1, Geometry, Algebra 2 (2018)

Published By: McGraw-Hill Education

| Date Published: 2020/10/22

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Focus & Coherence
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
12/18
13/16
Partially Meets Expectations
N/A
Focus & Coherence
12/18
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
13/16
Usability
N/A

Glencoe Traditional (2012)

Published By: McGraw-Hill Education

| Date Published: 2016/09/07

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Focus & Coherence
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
7/18
N/A
Does Not Meet Expectations
N/A
Focus & Coherence
7/18
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
N/A
Usability
N/A

HMH Integrated (2015)

Published By: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt

| Date Published: 2017/01/26

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Focus & Coherence
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
9/18
N/A
Does Not Meet Expectations
N/A
Focus & Coherence
9/18
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
N/A
Usability
N/A

HMH Into AGA (2020)

Published By: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt

| Date Published: 2020/10/22

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Focus & Coherence
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
15/18
15/16
Meets Expectations
33/36
Focus & Coherence
15/18
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
15/16
Usability
33/36

HMH Traditional (2015)

Published By: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt

| Date Published: 2016/06/01

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Focus & Coherence
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
9/18
N/A
Does Not Meet Expectations
N/A
Focus & Coherence
9/18
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
N/A
Usability
N/A

Holt McDougal Larson Traditional Series (2012)

Published By: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt

| Date Published: 2018/07/31

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Focus & Coherence
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
8/18
N/A
Does Not Meet Expectations
N/A
Focus & Coherence
8/18
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
N/A
Usability
N/A

Interactive Mathematics Program - Integrated (2015)

Published By: Activate Learning

| Date Published: 2018/04/03

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Focus & Coherence
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
10/18
12/16
Partially Meets Expectations
N/A
Focus & Coherence
10/18
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
12/16
Usability
N/A

Kendall Hunt's Illustrative Mathematics Traditional (2019)

Published By: Kendall Hunt Publishing Company

| Date Published: 2020/03/26

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Focus & Coherence
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
18/18
16/16
Meets Expectations
36/36
Focus & Coherence
18/18
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
16/16
Usability
36/36

LearnZillion Illustrative Mathematics Traditional (2019)

Published By: LearnZillion

| Date Published: 2020/03/26

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Focus & Coherence
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
18/18
16/16
Meets Expectations
36/36
Focus & Coherence
18/18
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
16/16
Usability
36/36

Math Techbook Integrated Math I, II, and III (2017)

Published By: Discovery Education

| Date Published: 2017/05/04

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Focus & Coherence
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
15/18
16/16
Meets Expectations
27/36
Focus & Coherence
15/18
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
16/16
Usability
27/36

Math Techbook Traditional Series (2017)

Published By: Discovery Education

| Date Published: 2017/05/04

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Focus & Coherence
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
16/18
16/16
Meets Expectations
27/36
Focus & Coherence
16/18
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
16/16
Usability
27/36

Mathematics Vision Project (MVP) Integrated (2016)

Published By: Mathematics Vision Project

| Date Published: 2017/06/21

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Focus & Coherence
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
15/18
15/16
Meets Expectations
23/36
Focus & Coherence
15/18
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
15/16
Usability
23/36

Mathematics Vision Project (MVP) Traditional (2016)

Published By: Mathematics Vision Project

| Date Published: 2019/09/03

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Focus & Coherence
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
15/18
15/16
Meets Expectations
23/36
Focus & Coherence
15/18
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
15/16
Usability
23/36

Meaningful Math Algebra 1, Geometry, Algebra 2 Traditional (2014-2015)

Published By: Activate Learning

| Date Published: 2018/04/03

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Focus & Coherence
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
10/18
12/16
Partially Meets Expectations
N/A
Focus & Coherence
10/18
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
12/16
Usability
N/A

Pearson Integrated (2014)

Published By: Savvas Learning Company (f/k/a Pearson)

| Date Published: 2016/06/01

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Focus & Coherence
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
6/18
N/A
Does Not Meet Expectations
N/A
Focus & Coherence
6/18
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
N/A
Usability
N/A

Pearson Traditional (2015)

Published By: Savvas Learning Company (f/k/a Pearson)

| Date Published: 2016/09/23

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Focus & Coherence
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
8/18
N/A
Does Not Meet Expectations
N/A
Focus & Coherence
8/18
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
N/A
Usability
N/A

Reveal Math Integrated (2020)

Published By: McGraw-Hill Education

| Date Published: 2020/08/13

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Focus & Coherence
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
16/18
15/16
Meets Expectations
34/36
Focus & Coherence
16/18
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
15/16
Usability
34/36

Reveal Math Traditional (2020)

Published By: McGraw-Hill Education

| Date Published: 2020/03/05

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Focus & Coherence
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
16/18
15/16
Meets Expectations
33/36
Focus & Coherence
16/18
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
15/16
Usability
33/36

Saxon Algebra I, Geometry, Algebra II (2009)

Published By: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt

| Date Published: 2018/02/07

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Focus & Coherence
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
8/18
N/A
Does Not Meet Expectations
N/A
Focus & Coherence
8/18
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
N/A
Usability
N/A

SpringBoard Integrated (2014)

Published By: College Board

| Date Published: 2017/05/04

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Focus & Coherence
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
11/18
14/16
Partially Meets Expectations
N/A
Focus & Coherence
11/18
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
14/16
Usability
N/A

SpringBoard Traditional (2015)

Published By: College Board

| Date Published: 2016/06/03

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Focus & Coherence
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
9/18
N/A
Does Not Meet Expectations
N/A
Focus & Coherence
9/18
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
N/A
Usability
N/A

Walch Traditional, Florida Edition (2018)

Published By: Walch Education

| Date Published: 2019/05/24

| EdReports Review Tool v1

| View These Reports

Grade
Level
Focus & Coherence
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
Alignment Rating
Usability Rating
15/18
11/16
Partially Meets Expectations
N/A
Focus & Coherence
15/18
Rigor & Mathematical Practices
11/16
Usability
N/A

The EdReports rubric supports a sequential review process through three gateways. These gateways reflect the importance of alignment to college and career ready standards and considers other attributes of high-quality curriculum, such as usability and design, as recommended by educators.

Materials must meet or partially meet expectations for the first set of indicators (gateway 1) to move to the other gateways. 

Gateways 1 and 2 focus on questions of alignment to the standards. Are the instructional materials aligned to the standards? Are all standards present and treated with appropriate depth and quality required to support student learning?

Gateway 3 focuses on the question of usability. Are the instructional materials user-friendly for students and educators? Materials must be well designed to facilitate student learning and enhance a teacher’s ability to differentiate and build knowledge within the classroom. 

In order to be reviewed and attain a rating for usability (Gateway 3), the instructional materials must first meet expectations for alignment (Gateways 1 and 2).

EdReports.org’s tools evaluate instructional materials from the educator and student perspective. We know when materials enter a classroom, teachers are looking for two key features: are the materials aligned to college- and career- ready standards and are they usable for students and educators?

Alignment: The foundation of the review process is the evaluation of the instructional materials’ alignment to college- and career-ready standards. Reviewers examine not only the presence of standards, but how well the standards are sequenced and the depth with which standards are included. Aligned materials allow students to engage with texts, problems, and assessments that build logically from year to year so that they graduate college- and career-ready.

Our overall alignment rating combines the scores for the following categories:

  • In ELA: 

    • Text Quality and Complexity (gateway 1)

    • Building Knowledge Texts, Vocabulary, and Tasks (gateway 2)

  • In Math: 

    • Focus and Coherence (gateway 1)

    • Rigor and Mathematical Practices (gateway 2)

  • In Science:

    • Designed for NGSS (gateway 1)

    • Coherence and Scope (gateway 2)

Usability: The review process also examines whether or not the instructional materials are usable for students and educators. Materials must be well designed to facilitate student learning and enhance a teacher’s ability to differentiate and build knowledge within the classroom. It also means that the materials offer assessments that help educators and parents focus on strengths and areas of growth, and incorporate technology effectively as a means to helping students learn.

If materials meet expectations for alignment, then the final rating assigned is the usability score (gateway 3).